Friday, December 16, 2011

Stevie Wonder, Mariah Carey and Spike Lee get 2012 BET Honors


Stevie Wonder (Jason Merritt/Getty Images), Maya Angelou (Marvin Joseph/The Washington Post), Spike Lee (Andy Kropa/Getty Images), and Mariah Carey (Cindy Ord/Getty Images) have been tapped for the 2012 BET Honors.








BET will announce Monday an A-list lineup for its fifth annual Honors show in D.C. next month: Maya Angelou, Stevie Wonder, Spike Leeand Mariah Carey will be celebrated next month in D.C. for lifetime achievement to African-American culture, the network announced Monday. Also on the 2012 roster: The Tuskegee Airmen and track coach Beverly Kearney.
The night is BET’s equivalent of the Kennedy Center Honors: A black-tie tribute hosted by actress Gabrielle Union with a glitzy red carpet, VIP presenters, big-name performers, and lots of after-parties. The award show takes place Sat., Jan. 14 at the Warner Theatre.

James Earl Jones Talks Growing Up With A Racist Grandmother On BBC World News

James Earl Jones


black-voices

James Earl Jones opened up about the "most racist person" he has ever known: his grandmother.
During an interview with BBC News, the actor and famous voice of Darth Vader, shared information about growing up in rural Mississippi with his grandmother whom he said was profoundly racist, despite her Cherokee, Choctaw Indian and African American roots.
"She was the most racist person, bigoted person I've ever known," Jones told BBC's Stephen Sackur. "She trained us that way. She would consider it defensive racism, but it's still racism, it's still the same poison."
Jones said he credits his grandmother with giving him his "first need for independent thinking" after he moved from Mississippi to Michigan, and giving him the ability to empathize with racists.
I'd go to school with white kids and Indian kids. I knew they weren't the devils that she said they were. I had to start thinking for myself, and I had to start understanding the extent to which she was right too. But I can now live in the shoes of racists. When I hear about racists, I know exactly what they're feeling. I said 'I'm gonna allow myself to feel that, just for the hell of it.' So I know what they're going through.
The actor is currently starring in "Driving Miss Daisy" alongside Vanessa Redgrave at the Wyndham's Theatre in London. In November, he received an honorary Academy Award for lifetime achievement onstage after a performance, where he graciously accepted the award.
"You cannot be an actor like I am and not have been in some of the worst movies like I have," he said. "But I stand before you deeply honored, mighty grateful and just plain gobsmacked."

Houston's Kevin Sumlin to coach A&MH

Kevin Sumlin

HOUSTON -- Coach Kevin Sumlin and his prolific offense made Houston a power in Conference USA.

His next challenge will be trying to replicate that success in the Southeastern Conference, the country's toughest football league, as Texas A&M's new coach.
Sumlin was hired as the Aggies' new coach on Saturday, less than two weeks after Mike Sherman was fired following a disappointing 6-6 finish.
The Aggies (6-6) are scheduled to play Northwestern (6-6) in the Meineke Car Care Bowl in Houston on Dec. 31, with A&M defensive coordinator Tim DeRuyter serving as interim coach.
It will be the Aggies' last game as a Big 12 team before moving to the SEC next season.
"(We) spoke to many worthy and qualified candidates, but my decision, which was made in consultation with president (R. Bowen) Loftin, kept leading me to Kevin," athletic director Bill Byrne said. "I believe he is the right person to lead our football program into the Southeastern Conference. First of all, Kevin is a terrific person. He is also one heck of a recruiter and he will put together a great staff."
It will be his second stint at the school after working as an assistant under R.C. Slocum in 2001-02.
"I am very excited about the opportunity to serve as the head football coach at Texas A&M University," Sumlin said in a statement. "Having coached there before, I understand the culture and embrace the commitment by the 12th Man regarding Aggie football. Aggieland is a special place and I look forward to working with the young men in the football program and recruiting the type of players we need to be successful in the SEC."
Slocum, A&M's coach from 1989-2002, raved about Sumlin.
"Kevin Sumlin is very respected in the coaching profession," Slocum said. "He is an excellent recruiter, a solid coach with a lot of experience, and a great person. He will do well as head coach of the Aggies."
Sumlin, who was Houston's first black head coach, is also the first black coach at Texas A&M.
"The hiring of Kevin Sumlin is a great opportunity to build on the solid foundation left by Coach Sherman," said former Texas A&M linebacker Steve Solari, who played for the Aggies in the early 1990s. "Hiring the first African-American head football coach at A&M is a momentous occasion."
Speculation intensified that Sumlin would move about 100 miles northwest to College Station when A&M fired Sherman after he went 25-25 in four seasons.
[+] EnlargeKevin Sumlin
AP Photo/David J. PhillipKevin Sumlin, who has established Houston as a national contender in Conference USA, was an assistant coach at Texas A&M from 2001-02.
Sumlin told the Cougars that he was leaving in an emotional meeting on Saturday afternoon.
The Cougars (12-1) play Penn State (9-3) in the TicketCity Bowl in Dallas on Jan. 2 with assistant Tony Levine serving as the interim head coach.
Sumlin, 47, went 35-17 in four seasons with Houston, and the Cougars routinely ranked as one of the nation's highest scoring teams.
He was on campus on Friday to join in the celebration of Houston's upcoming move to the Big East.
"When you have a head coach, the one thing that you ask is that you leave the program in better shape than what you inherited," Houston athletic director Mack Rhoades said. "And there's no question that Coach Sumlin did that."
Houston won its first 12 games this year and was in line for a Bowl Championship Series berth this season until losing at home to Southern Mississippi in the C-USA championship game.
Despite the loss, Sumlin remained a hot name to fill just about every high-profile coaching vacancy available. Reports linked him to Mississippi, Illinois, Arizona State and UCLA, in addition to Texas A&M.
The Aggies entered this season with 18 returning starters and a top-10 ranking. They were expected to contend for the Big 12 championship and be a factor in the national title hunt, but then lost early games to Oklahoma State and Arkansas after holding double-digit halftime leads.
A&M won three in a row after the first skid, but a three-game losing streak, which included two overtime losses, ensured the Aggies of a mediocre season. The low point of the season came when Texas A&M ended its more than century-old rivalry with Texas with a 27-25 loss at home on Thanksgiving.
Byrne said he met with Sumlin on Saturday morning to finalize the offer. Details of his contract were not announced, pending approval by A&M's board of regents.
An Indianapolis native, Sumlin played linebacker for Purdue in the 1980s before beginning his coaching career as a graduate assistant at Washington State in 1989. He worked as an assistant at Wyoming and Minnesota before returning to his alma mater to work as an assistant coach under Joe Tiller while Drew Brees starred for the Boilermakers.
Sumlin moved to Texas A&M in 2001 to work for Slocum as an offensive assistant. Slocum was fired after the 2002 season, which included a victory over then-No. 1 Oklahoma.
Terrence Murphy was a receiver for the Aggies when Sumlin worked for Slocum.
"He really cares about the players as individuals and that makes you as a player want to give everything you have for him," Murphy said. "This is a great decision by Texas A&M."
Sooners' coach Bob Stoops then hired Sumlin in 2003 as a special teams coordinator and tight ends coach. Sumlin was promoted to co-offensive coordinator in 2006, and a year later, Oklahoma ranked fifth in scoring (42.3 points) and 19th in total offense (448.9 yards per game) on its way to the Fiesta Bowl.
Houston hired Sumlin in December 2007, and Sumlin vowed to use what he learned from Stoops to build up the Cougars' program.
After the loss to Southern Miss, Rhoades shot down a media report that Sumlin would be hired as the next coach at Texas A&M. Rhoades promised to do everything in his power to retain Sumlin, whose contract ran through the 2015 season.
Ultimately, the rumor proved to be true.
Sumlin will officially be introduced at a press conference in College Station on Monday. Houston, meanwhile, will begin its search for Sumlin's successor, with its own new conference and the promise of a new football stadium to sell.

Rev. Al deep in the red

REV. AL SHARPTON High salary, higher debt.

New York Post



The Rev. Al Sharpton’s nonprofit paid him nearly $242,000 — even as it carried $1.6 million in debt, according to documents obtained by The Post.
In all, the controversial activist and his empire, including the National Action Network and two for-profit companies, were $5.3 million in the red, public records show.
Most of NAN’s money woes stemmed from more than $880,000 in unpaid federal payroll taxes, interest and penalties. It also paid more than $100,000 to settle two lawsuits, byproducts of the unpaid bills.
And it still owed $206,252 in loans to Sharpton’s for-profit Bo-Spanky Consulting Inc. and Sharpton Media LLC, the records show.



Sharpton drew a $241,732 salary and perks that included first-class or charter air travel, tax filings show. He owes the IRS $2.6 million in income tax, and nearly $900,000 in state tax.
The defunct Rev-Al Communications Inc. owes the state almost $176,000, and Bo-Spanky is $3,500 behind on state-tax liens.
Sharpton has said he is on a repayment plan with state and federal-tax authorities.
NAN last year took in more than $3 million in donations, which allowed it to chip away at its tax burden. This year, its board of directors voted to resolve the tax issues and paid all back state taxes, said Executive Director Tamika Mallory.
The civil-rights group is also addressing the $883,503 it owes in federal payroll taxes, she added.
And it is close to finished repaying the Peabody Hotel in Memphis $106,981 owed since 2008, when NAN skipped out on its bill after its annual convention, according to its 2010 audited financial statements.
Plus, it paid $5,500 to a Phoenix developer to settle a legal dispute over the rental of chapter offices.

Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/rev_al_deep_in_the_red_FFFX2IRlXVlP0sh79dWyxL#ixzz1gHTC9FEV

Interracial marriage gains acceptance

Story Image
Michael and Samantha Herrod work together at their Merrillville, Ind. home Tuesday December 6, 2011. The Herrods have been married for 12 years and have two children. | Stephanie Dowell~Sun-Times Media
Love is color blind
According to the study by Ohio State University and Cornell University, almost all men and women of various ethnicities in 2008 were more likely to marry Americans of another race than in 1980. Those include:
White men — 7.5 percent in 2008 compared to 3.8 percent in 1980
Black men — 23.1 percent in 2008, 7.3 percent in 1980
Asian men — 66.9 percent in 2008, 50.6 percent in 1980
Hispanic men — 54.1 percent in 2008, 39.6 percent in 1980
White women — 7.9 percent in 2008, 4.6 percent in 1980
Black women — 12.1 percent in 2008, 3.1 percent in 1980
Asian women — 69.3 percent in 2008, 52.9 percent in 1980
Hispanic women — 58.2 percent in 2008, 39.6 percent in 1980
ARTICLE EXTRAS

When Michaile and Anthony Broadnax decided they wanted to get married in 1989, the first minister they went to wouldn’t marry them.
That’s because Michaile is white and Anthony is black.
The second minister they approached told them he would do it but people in the congregation wouldn’t like it. The Munster couple said that was just one of multiple times they had to deal with racism at the beginning of their relationship. Those issues have dwindled over the years, however, as people become more and more comfortable with interracial marriages.
That comfort has helped lead to an increase in mixed relationships during the past three decades, according to a study by Ohio State University and Cornell University. The study, based on data from the U.S. Census Bureau, shows that men and women in 2008 of almost every ethnicity were more likely to be in an interracial marriage than they were in 1980.
The biggest increase was between blacks and whites, according to the study. For instance, just 4.7 percent of married black men in 1980 had a white wife. That increased to 14.4 percent by 2008, according to the study. Although Hispanics and Asians were still more likely to intermarry with whites, it didn’t increase as much because more Asian and Hispanic immigrants came to the country during this time. According to the study, this means the increase in marriages between blacks and whites is due to a lessening of racist attitudes.
Not so easy
Those changes mean local couples like the Broadnaxes face a more open world and more couples like themselves.
Michaile and Anthony met while they were working for the town of Munster on summer break from college. Anthony, who was raised in Gary, noticed Michaile, whose family is from Crown Point but who grew up elsewhere, during lunch breaks. The two started talking and getting to know each other.
“It sounds nice and easy, but it wasn’t,” she said.
The two were aware issues would arise with a romantic relationship and, although they didn’t hide it, they also didn’t spread the news to family members, he said. Michaile said three years before she met Anthony when she was going off to college for the first time, her father spoke about race for the first time.
“Don’t bring home a black guy,” she says he told her.
Her grandmother’s husband told her not to bring Anthony to his Crown Point home, she said, and the one time she did bring Anthony, he waved Anthony away. Michaile’s mother didn’t object to Anthony so much as she was concerned about the problems that Michaile would face by being in an mixed relationship.
Anthony said although his family didn’t express issues with the relationship, he does think they had their own concerns. He said he had trust issues, however, because he couldn’t understand why a white woman would want to date him. He said he was just used to white people at Southlake Mall (now Westfield Southlake) staring at him whenever he went there after school.
“You always felt you were suspect,” he said.
As bad as problems were for the Broadnaxes, they weren’t as extreme as those experienced by Hobart couple Samantha and Michael Herrod when they got married in 1999. Her father’s side of the family wouldn’t even come to the wedding, she said.
Samantha grew up in Hobart and her family never mixed with black people.
“I’d hate to say they were prejudiced, but they almost were, surrounded by white people,” she said.
The couple, who met while they worked at the Post-Tribune, has suffered other forms of racism, Herrod said. They used to get looks, usually from middle-age people, when they would go shopping together. The couple both delivered the newspaper in their Hobart neighborhood, and a neighbor once called the police on Michael, who is black.
“We had a lot of issues,” she said.
Changes come slowly
Despite the problems the Broadnaxes and Herrods have faced, it hasn’t all been bad, they said. Michaile Broadnax said it was her father, who once told her not to bring home a black man, who actually soothed over her mother’s concerns about the relationship. He had started to interact more with black people, she said, and got over his prejudices. It was also another family member, her grandmother, who stepped in between her husband and Anthony. Michaile said she eventually found out her grandmother told her husband that if he didn’t accept Anthony, they were through.
As for the Herrods, her father’s family did a 180-degree turn, she said. The Herrods now host the family’s annual Christmas party at their home, which used to be her father’s mother’s house.
Both couples say it’s gotten better since they first met, which a Pew Foundation study supports. The survey shows that just 48 percent of people in 1987, the year Michaile and Anthony met, were OK with marriages between blacks and whites. By 2009, support had increased to 83 percent.
Michaile and Anthony said that when they moved back to Northwest Indiana about five years ago after living in a diverse neighborhood in Houston, they didn’t consider living in Munster because they thought it was too homogenous. But after living in Crown Point for a year, they realized that Munster actually was more mixed and have felt comfortable living there ever since.
Their daughter and son have never had issues with other children or parental objection to them because they’re biracial, they said. Even their time in Crown Point, which used to be known as a place where blacks had to leave by sundown, was positive.
“We didn’t have one lick of a problem,” Michaile said.
The family has faced some problems with how people react to seeing them with their children, Michaile said, adding that a man at her church once asked her what it was like to have children who didn’t look like her.
“All he saw was their skin tone and hair color,” she said.
Samantha Herrod said her own children have fared well in the diverse Merrillville schools.
“I think people are more accepting,” she said, noting the stares have lessened over the years, although not completely.
Attitudes today
The changes of attitudes toward interracial couples mean that newer ones, such as Portage residents Nicole and Gerardo Ramirez, have not faced the same kind of problems that the Broadnaxes and Herrods did. Nicole and Gerardo first met when they were 12 and 13, she said, and the two Gary natives dated on and off as their paths kept crossing. He proposed in 2005, a year before she graduated from Purdue University. Although layoffs and their two children delayed the wedding, they finally tied the knot on Nov. 11, joining several other couples getting married at the Porter County Courthouse.
“It wasn’t really that big of a deal to me,” Nicole said of their dating.
She said that neither one of them had actually thought that they would marry someone of a different race, but at the same time they didn’t think it was odd to be in a romantic relationship with people of other races. Nicole, who is black, said she dated white men in college, and that Gerardo, who is Latino, was surrounded by black people growing up in Gary so that it came naturally for him.
“I guess just thinking about it, if it’s meant to be, it is,” she said.
Both of their family and friends were accepting, and she said they’ve never experienced outright racism. That doesn’t mean they never face any problems. Nicole said people have asked her if she’s baby-sitting their two children, who are light skinned and can appear to be Latino,
“I have to be baby-sitting someone’s kids, they can’t be mine,” she said of what other people think.
While they receive looks or questions from some people, Nicole said she thinks most people are used to interracial couples and know, at least, that society now accepts them.
“You’re always going to have somebody who disapproves of whatever,” Nicole said. “But they’re not going to be open about it.”
Part of that, she said, is because there are so many more interracial couples. Nicole said she’s just as likely to see an interracial couple as she is to see one of the same race.
The Broadnaxes and Herrods also say they’re seeing more couples like them, not just in society but within their own families. Samantha Herrod said her husband’s sons from another relationship are all in mixed relationships. The Broadnaxes’ son, who is going to his father’s alma mater Rose Hulman University, is dating a white woman, they said. Michaile said that although she was concerned about what the woman’s family would think, it turned out fine.
Michaile and Anthony said despite their initial years of facing more discrimination, there have always been signs of acceptance. Soon after their own wedding in 1989, they attended a friend’s marriage to someone of another race in Anderson. Unlike the pastor who refused to marry them, this one talked about how race didn’t matter in marriage — it’s about who they are as people.

Thursday, December 15, 2011

Still a long way to go on path to tolerance




Tulsa World
By MIKE JONES Associate Editor

A 30ish African-American woman is at a Tulsa nightclub with friends. There is live music and a festive crowd. She is a fun-loving young woman who enjoys dancing. As the band plays she begins to dance alone, as many young people do. As the dance floor begins to fill, she glides by a man sitting at a table near the dance floor. She asks, "Do you want to dance?"

"No," he answers. She asks, "Do you not like to dance?" He answers, "Yes, I like to dance, but I don't like black people."

Another time, the same young African-American woman is visiting a popular suburban nightclub, again with live music. She is with friends who mostly are white. She doesn't feel particularly welcome at this club but she is a friendly person (and, it so happens, a non-drinker) and is making the best of it. She is at the bar talking with her companions. A nice-looking man at the bar is looking at her. She looks back and smiles. His opening line? "You're really pretty - for a colored girl." She and her friends decide it's time to leave. They exit the club, get into their car and are followed to the city limits by a police car.

Oh, yes, we've come a long way haven't we? Of course, the young woman was allowed into the bars, we've come that far. And she and her friends weren't followed by anyone planning to do them harm. But it is alarming, shameful and, to some degree, surprising that such animosity toward a person of a different race still exists.

I have, throughout the last decade or so, begun thinking that prejudice and racism were, if not behind us, at least isolated to an ignorant few. Sadly, I have been proven wrong time and time again.

I suppose I have been somewhat sheltered. My friends, at least the ones with whom I spend the most time, are open minded when it comes to such things. Some might even be, heaven forfend, liberals.

I have spent the last 25 years around my son and his friends who are the most tolerant people I have ever been around. My son has spent the last 10 or 11 years playing original, live music in nightclubs and at festivals in and out of Tulsa and Oklahoma. I have attended most of the band's performances. I have seen first hand the interaction of ethnic groups. I can count on one hand the number of times I have seen trouble caused by intolerance. These people even tolerate old duffers like me.

Believe me, testosterone and alcohol cause more fights than disagreements over race issues.

Still, prejudice, racism and intolerance hang upon society like a bad suit and inflict much deeper wounds than the occasional brawl over who made a pass (real or imagined) at whose girlfriend.

When I start getting overly confident about the progress society is making toward tolerance, I pick up a copy of a Southern Poverty Law Center report and usually I am brought crashing back to reality.

According to a recent SPLC report, there are 1,002 active hate groups in the United States, 23 of them in Oklahoma. "All hate groups have beliefs or practices that attack or malign an entire class of people, typically for their immutable characteristics," the report says.

The disturbing news does not stop at the SPLC. And prejudice is not limited to African-Americans. One only has to read the news about the latest law aimed at illegal immigrants or Muslims.

I'm not saying that everyone concerned by illegal immigration is racist. There are legitimate concerns about what to do about those coming in and those who are already here. What is the wrong path are the onerous and possibly unconstitutional state laws such as those passed by Arizona, Oklahoma and now Alabama.

Even Republican presidential candidates Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry have supported fair and reasonable laws concerning illegal immigrants. Gingrich recently said that those illegal immigrants who have established roots over years should be treated fairly and offered some path toward citizenship. Perry, as governor of Texas, has supported allowing children of illegal immigrants the chance to get a higher education.

As sure as the dialogue about illegal immigrants ought to move forward and as fair as most people want to be, the element of prejudice cannot be denied.

There is an inherent fear of those who are different. That and a struggling economy make for easy scapegoats. Today, it is the Hispanics. In history it has been the Jews, Poles, Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Italians, Irish and just about every other ethnic group who migrated to the United States in search of freedom and the American dream.

Some provisions of the Alabama law are being challenged in court but other parts already have caused havoc in Alabama. Migrant farm workers, afraid of arrest or worse, have fled the state leaving farms with crops withering in the fields.

There is an even uglier side to laws such as Alabama's House Bill 56. One of its sponsors, state Sen. Scott Beason, was taped by the FBI calling the black residents of Greene County "aborigines." He also at one time urged fellow Republicans to "empty the clip" to stop illegal immigration.

As much progress as the country has made with its African-American population, it still has far to go. The same difficult path will have to be followed by our Hispanic population.

Sadly, as the events in two of Tulsa's more upscale nightclubs proves, the path has no end in sight.


Original Print Headline: How far? The path toward tolerance remains long

Read more from this Tulsa World article at http://www.tulsaworld.com/opinion/article.aspx?subjectid=61&articleid=20111211_61_G1_AishAf283180

Black Politics and Black “Underprivilegedness”

Black Politics and Black “Underprivilegedness”




by Damion White
The criticisms of Herman Cain, and Herman Cain subsequently ending his campaign for the Republican nomination to be the GOP candidate for president, have provoked considerable backlash especially amongst those who contend that the African American community does not accept Black conservatives. Furthermore, those who make up this constituency often ascribe to the belief that government policies – and in particular those policies that have come to be most closely associated with liberals and progressives – are root causes perpetuating the marginalization (or “underprivilegedness”) of African Americans, as is defined by the belief that African Americans share a disposition in favor of accepting government assistance. As President Obama so eloquently and adamantly outlined in his “New, New Nationalist” speech this week, I am here to tell you: this is wrong.
Leasing the Property of Intellects
First and foremost, it is critical to understand that the attitudes of African Americans do not occur in a vacuum, although our society often seems to think or – what seems like – to hope that they do. In my opinion, an ideology more marginalizing than any welfare policy is the expectation that there is some sort of national black consciousness – some inherent commonality that comes as part of being born an African American and that somehow transcends any and all by-products of individual experience.
Dissimilarly – beyond that of White attitudes towards African Americans or White attitudes having to do with matters of race – how frequently do we hear any discussions pertaining to White attitudes framed in terms of those attitudes as property belonging to “Caucasian Americans?” More succinctly, when was the last time you heard the news media or a cable network pundit characterize the decision making of White Americans as a function of being White? Other than questions involving racially motivated attitudes (i.e. attitudes towards interracial marriage) I have never observed any studies, surveys or polls where Whites were grouped in the sense that they are inherently connected via a decision making apparatus unique to White people.
It is this way of thinking about African Americans that perpetuates theirunderprivilegedness – not unemployment insurance, welfare or Medicaid. The dynamic created by this subjugation is in my opinion the only concretely identifiable and unique commonality inherent to African Americans’ existence – the expectation that all Black people – regardless of individual experience – will formulate their view of the world as a result of their Blackness. Equally as important is the fact that many African Americans are able to perceive that this burdensome expectation is all but non-existent in the lives of their White counterparts or in the lives of any other racial group in this country.  This is devilishly, the most racist, yet simultaneously, the least conspicuous ideal that is levied against the African American population.
This concept also invokes Ralph Ellison’s ideas from Invisible Man, where life as an African American has no other choice than to mitigate a societally inflicted dual consciousness, in the sense that the African American’s world views are as beholden to the views (or expectations of African American views) projected onto the African American by non-African Americans, as they are to the African American’s life experiences, talents, and directly affective environmental conditions. This is reiterated in the anthropological-sociological viewpoint that discrimination – not prejudice – is reserved for the power brokers in any given society.
This means that it is plausible to believe that African Americans are disproportionately unemployed – as we have observed that they indeed are – because disproportionately represented White employers believe that African Americans generally have poor work ethic, or negative attitudes towards authority (or more specifically towards whites); whereas, any similar attitudes held by African Americans towards Whites (or others) cannot similarly affect such systemic outcomes for those non-African Americans. The hijacking of the right to individual consciousness and the ability to credibly prescribe meaning to the worldview of another that is not necessarily aligned with that individual’s characterization of their own worldview is what lies at the root of African American’sunderprivilegedness.
In The Context of Today’s Political Landscape
As it relates to the here-and-now these themes are some that one might attribute to the comfort and the confidence with which many suggest that African Americans voted for Barack Obama in record fashion simply because he is almost an African American or more precisely perhaps, because he cannot pass for a Caucasian American. However, I will take this opportunity, as they are few and far between, to remind us that Barack Obama is more Caucasian American than he is African American.
The distinctive qualifier among African Americans is being a part of the slave-narrative in this country; having no known heritage in immigration or any discernible ties to a trans-Atlantic sovereignty. Barack Obama was raised by his White American mother and her parents, his White American grandparents, and he had a father from Kenya who came with a definitive sense of self and a definitive sense of his own history – that of which is not typically afforded most African Americans six and seven generations removed from slavery. Barack Obama, by this frame of reference can stake more claim in his being American – as his White counterparts can and do – than he can in his being African American.
Similarly aligned to the position suggesting that African Americans voted for Barack Obama because he qualifies as being a Black man – and not because African Americans could have possibly, come to find Obama to be thoughtful, intelligent, well spoken, hardworking, or most importantly, aligned with their political ideologies  – is the position that Herman Cain was derailed by a Left-Wing conspiracy in conjunction with what amounted to the inevitable derision of his campaign and candidacy by his own people (the same people that Cain himself chided as being brainwashed by Democrats). Essentially this belief suggests that it was written that Cain would be deemed unacceptable by African Americans, simply because he was Black and conservative.
In other words, Herman Cain could have been the second coming of Jesus ChristHimself, and his Blackness as a GOP candidate would have gotten him no further than an above-all-else effort to destroy him as a candidate; whereas if he were White, he would be adequately insulated against even his most boneheaded blunders (ahem… Newt Gingrich, Michelle Bachmann, Sarah Palin, etc.).
This suggests that when it comes to participating in the democratic process, African Americans are expressly unable to formulate an intelligent opinion based on a candidate’s policies or the content of a candidate’s character, especially in the case that the candidate can be defined as both conservative and Black. In other (other) words African Americans are individually incapable of enacting a political ideology in a real-time context beyond that of autocratically selecting candidates that are Democrats – except when it applies to diminishing the candidacy of representatives of the Republican Party who also happen to be African American.