Friday, May 4, 2012

Time's Most Influential Black People


  •  

  •  
  •  


  • Home
    Time's Most Influential Black People
    Time
    Time magazine says that its annual list of "The 100 Most Influential People in the World" contains those who "inspire us, entertain us, challenge us and change our world" and have "created a ripple effect in countless fields." Divided into categories based on the nature of their contributions (pioneers, moguls, leaders and icons), it includes some individuals you know well, and some you probably haven't heard of.
    President Obama is there -- that's no surprise. For the first time since 1999, Oprah Winfrey didn't make the list, but Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan did, along with Fatou Bensouda, chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court; Jamaican Prime Minister Portia Simpson Miller; and University of Maryland educator Freeman Hrabowski. Black entertainers on the list include Rihanna, Viola Davis and Raphael Saadiq.
    President Obama wrote the short tribute essay to honoree Warren Buffett, the inspiration for his "Buffet rule" approach to taxation of billionaires and millionaires. It includes this:
    But it's fair to say that things got a little better for Warren Buffett after that. His shares recovered, he sold them for a small profit, and he has spent the seven decades since in a relentless search for value. Warren has seen countless financial fads come and go. Through them all, he's sought companies with real promise and invested with integrity.
    Clearly, it's a winning formula. Today Warren is not just one of the world's richest men but also one of the most admired and respected. He has devoted the vast majority of his wealth to those around the world who are suffering, or sick, or in need of help. And he uses his stature as a leader to press others of great means to do the same.
    Read the entire list at Time magazine.
    Like The Root on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter.

    McDonald’s Worker Spits in Tea: How Gross is Fast Food?

    Police in South Carolina say that a McDonald's worker spit in two customers' cups of iced tea after they returned them because they weren't sweet enough. A video shows the employee,19-year-old Marvin Washington Jr., leaning over the open cups before giving them back. The fast food chain patrons claim they discovered phlegm in the drinks when they removed their tops. He was arrested Wednesday and charged with malicious tampering with food.
    Eating out can be an exercise in suspended disbelief. Wide eyed, we assume the food is fresh and wholesome and that workers have followed the "employees must wash hands" decree posted in the bathroom. Nevertheless, the McDonald's incident is so sickening because it actually bears out the urban legend that a disdainful waiter can and will contaminate your food if you tick him off.
    Kitchen Confidential
    Chef and television personality Anthony Bourdain's bestseller, Kitchen Confidential: Adventures in the Culinary Underbelly, exposed the grungy side of the culinary world over a decade ago. Not only is the book a rollicking memoir about coming of age in the 1970s and 80s, it's a veritable primer for how not to get food poisoning on date night. Bourdain rudely threw open the kitchen doors and exposed restaurants' dirty little tricks such as filtering cigarette ash out of used butter to make a sauce and serving old beef to the customers who ordered it well done.
    Chicken scandals
    There are many more recent examples of restaurants serving contaminated food and having unsanitary kitchens, especially by fast food joints. Most recently, a lawsuit by the former manager of a Kentucky Friend Chicken franchise in Oregon alleges the owner fired other employees for refusing to serve chicken that had turned green and passed its expiration date. According to the lawsuit, he resigned because he "couldn't stand serving rotten chicken to families anymore."
    The website kfcmademesick.com chronicles a not-so-finger-lickin'-good list of other health code violations associated with the fried chicken franchise. They include rodent infestations, salmonella contamination, and foreign objects such as bandages and cock roaches showing up in cooked food.
    Fast food dangers
    Not to single out one business, an undercover NBC Dateline investigation revealed that 60% of restaurants in the nation's top 10 chains had received critical health code violations in the year-and-a-half prior to the report. Caroline Smith-Dewaal who works for the Center for Science in the Public Interest, a food safety watchdog group, explained, "A critical violation is something that happens in a restaurant that may result in the food becoming contaminated."
    Some of the recurring problems at franchises such as McDonalds, Taco Bell, Wendy's, and Burger King were rodent droppings, insects, food borne illnesses, debris and grime on counters and in prep areas, and poor employee sanitation. Given that about 25% of Americans eat fast food everyday, that's millions of opportunities to be exposed to something nasty, or worse, a pathogen that could make you sick.
    The Huffington Post catalogs a revolting list of items reported to have been found in customers' fast food. Some of the gruesome highlights: maggots in Wendy's fries, saliva on a Whopper, a bloody band-aid in a Pizza Hut pizza crust, and a fried mouse in a basket of Popeye's chicken.
    As for independent restaurants, Bourdain claims that kitchens are more sanitary than when he was working on the line. "Things are much better now—with fish markets, with the quality of food handling in general," he told WebMD. "There is a sense of pride and raised expectations in kitchens now that didn't exist when I started out." The availability of restaurant inspection reports online may also be pushing owners to clean up their acts.
    Nevertheless, restaurant report cards have no control over the impulsive nature of human beings. Maybe it would be better just to sweeten that tea yourself.
    Related:
    New Mood News About Fast Food

    Four Negative Patterns That Predict Divorce

    Do you fight fair or are your fights going to destroy your relationship? 


    World-renowned researcher on marriage and relationships, Dr. John Gottman, says there are four negative patterns that often sound familiar to fighting couples.  
    Gottman tells Anderson that these four elements predict divorce, and called it "the four horsemen of the apocalypse."

    1. 
    Criticism: Gottman says criticism is "really a way of fueling the attack, so you state your complaint as an attack on the other person." He noted, "It's not constructive, it winds up leading to an escalation of the conflict."
    2. Contempt: "Not only is contempt the best predictor of divorce, because it's really this air of superiority. You need respect in a relationship."

    3. Defensiveness: Gottman explains people need to take responsibility for the problem, and can say to the other person, "What's your point? I mean, it makes some sense what you're saying. Tell me more.'" Dr. Gottman points out that defensiveness gets in the way of two people working as a team to figure out a solution.
    4. Stonewalling is also known as the silent treatment. Gottman says, "The stonewaller is really trying to calm down and not make it worse, but when you're faced with somebody who's silent like that, you escalate. So, it's a very disruptive pattern."

    What's the main thing you argue about with your significant other? Dr. Gottman says the number one thing couples fight about is... nothing at all! Take a look...  


    According to Gottman, there are three things you should never say in a fight with a significant other. Are you guilty?


    Have you said one of these three things when in a fight?

    1) You never...

    2) You always...

    3) Anything insulting, or acted superior.

    Thursday, May 3, 2012

    All 5 Kentucky Starters Say Adios; Hello NBA Draft

    Are you a fan of EURweb? Like us on  and Follow us on 

    kentucky players & coach
    Kentucky coach John Calipari, center, listens as Doron Lamb makes comments about entering the NBA draft during a news conference on Tuesday. Players pictured from left to right: Anthony Davis, Lamb, Terrence Jones, Michael Kidd-Gilchrist and Marquis Teague.
    *We knew it was too good to last. Oh well.
    Kentucky’s starting lineup of three freshmen and two sophomores did most everything together en route to the school’s eighth national title. Now, they will each go their separate ways in the NBA.
    Freshmen Anthony Davis, Michael Kidd-Gilchrist and Marquis Teague, and sophomores Terrence Jones and Doron Lamb declared for the draft in a nationally televised news conference Tuesday night.
    “Let me just say that Anthony and Doron and Terrence have decided to put their names in the NBA draft, so they will do that,” coach John Calipari said, pausing for a dramatic effect. “And Michael and Marquis Teague have also decided to put their names in the draft.
    “I was trying to scare some coaches out there, that’s all I was doing.”
    The group, all clad in similar blue UK golf shirts, came into the season largely untested before ascending to No. 1, winning the Southeastern Conference in dominating fashion and capping an NCAA tournament run with a 67-59 victory over Kansas in the title game.
    The five join seniors Darius Miller and Eloy Vargas leaving the program.

    Acura And The Value of Light-Skinned Black People

    Acura superbowl videoI spoke today to a group in Kalamazoo, Michigan.  The topic, organizational diversity, was the same as the one that would smack me in my face as soon as I left the stage.  Opening my cell phone, I saw a message from a member of the media asking me to comment on the recent Super Bowl ad for Acura, in which the company went through great pains to ensure that the Black actor was “friendly” and “not too dark.”
    What I find most interesting about these kinds of silly mistakes by major corporations is that, in most cases, the racial ridiculousness was typically inspired by a Black-owned marketing firm.  The easiest way for predominantly white corporations to get themselves into trouble is to rely on one “Black representative” to give the OK for anything they do that relates to race.   The in-depth analysis at “Any Corporation USA” might go something like this:
    “Shaquanda, we want to produce an ad with a big-lipped monkey wearing a gold chain, dancing for a piece of fried chicken, do you think Black people might find this to be offensive?”
    “No, my friends would probably think the ad was funny.”
    “OK then, let’s do it!”
    I am not sure who gave the go-ahead for the Acura ad, but the move was clearly a no-no.  What’s most interesting about these costly decisions is that they are likely a symptom of a lack of diversity in the company’s upper management:  Either there are no Black people making any of the important organizational decisions, or the Black people on board have been traumatized into being scared of their own shadows.  Every time I speak to a corporation about diversity issues, I always end up having those “secret conversations” with the Black employees that happen when their manager leaves the room.
    In other words, they are scared to death.
    The decision by Acura to communicate a preference for light-skinned Blacks over dark-skinned ones is obviously rooted in America’s deep and very sick commitment to white supremacy.
    It’s no secret that historically, the more a person of color matches the Eurocentric standard of beauty, the more the world defines that person to be of value.  In fact, I dare to say that if PresidentBarack Obama looked like Bill Duke or Wesley Snipes, he wouldn’t be President of the United States.
    Acura may pay dearly for its mistake, at least in the court of Black Public Opinion.  They should rightfully be expected to pay, since there is no excuse for this behavior.  But one can hope that this valuable lesson will help the organization learn that seeking out meaningful diversity within its corporate ranks can make the firm more efficient, effective, and productive.  This kind of silly thing tends to happen when there are no — empowered –Black people in the room.

    Auburn OL Shon Coleman practices after a two-year bout with leukemia

    It's been two years since Auburn offensive lineman Shon Coleman was diagnosed with leukemia. He was one of the highest rated offensive linemen in 2010 and could have seen early playing time.
    But just a few weeks after he signed with the Tigers, Coleman learned of his disease and had to defer his enrollment until 2011 while he underwent chemotherapy and radiation.
    On Wednesday, Coleman, whose cancer is in remission, made his Auburn practice debut in Jordan-Hare Stadium. Clad in shorts, a shell and a helmet per the NCAA's acclimation rules, Coleman participated in football for the first time since his senior year of high school.
    "We're going to take baby steps," coach Gene Chizik said. "We're going to take orders from our medical staff. We're not going to predict anything right now — we're just going to take it day-by-day and get him acclimated. It's been two-plus years since he's put on a uniform. We're just thrilled to have him out there."
    Apparently assistant coach Jeff Grimes didn't feel the need for an acclimation period and put Coleman through the same grueling non-contact drills he would any other player. When it was all over, teammates were moved by Coleman's presence on the field.
    "That really was amazing — just to see him stand up at the end of practice with his pads on,"linebacker Ashton Richardson said. "It lit something inside of me to see that. He went through so much with cancer and everything like that. It's encouragement. It gives everybody around a little more energy to go out there and realize that you can overcome."
    - - -
    "Like" Dr. Saturday on Facebook for football conversations and stuff you won't see on the blog. And follow Dr. Saturday at its new home on Twitter: @YahooDrSaturday

    Wednesday, May 2, 2012

    Cullen Jones Moves Swimmingly Towards London 2012


    BigLeadSports : BusinessApril 17th. 2012, 2:56pm
    As we move later into the spring, the 2012 London Olympic Games are coming more and more into view. Olympic team trials are going to be an almost weekly occurrence from now until June, and this week the United States Olympic Committee will hold its “100 Days” countdown celebration in New York City. With the “100 Days” announcement will come the next stage of sponsor engagement with brands and athletes leading up to the games. One of those key Olympic sponsors is Citi, who launched their program last week in New York. Citi’s Every Step of The Way Program will donate up to $500,000 to the USOC, via the organizations that each of the Team Citi athletes have selected. Those organizations are hometown organizations that helped get the athletes to where they are today.
    Fans through a very unique social program can direct social media points to the athlete of their choice to also help them reach their goal.
    In addition to tennis stars Bob and Mike Bryan, 2008 Olympic bronze medalists, Doubles Tennis, former Olympian Dominique Dawes, marathoner Meb Keflezighi, and Paralympic gold medalist Amanda McGrory, the Citi team includes Olympic gold medalist Cullen Jones. Jones, who almost drowned in a swimming accident at age five, is now leading the charge as an African American to raise the awareness on both the safety and health benefits of teaching young minorities to swim. A New York native, Jones won gold in Beijing and is gearing up for another big summer in London.
    We talked to Cullen about the program and what lies ahead this summer.
    Q: You were an Olympic veteran and have seen all kinds of sponsor programs, how is this one different for you?
    A: I would definitely say that the Citi “Every Step of the Way” program is different because it’s helping an athlete like myself, and the other members of Team Citi, with an unique initiative to benefit a program that’s very close to my own heart. I’ve been working with “Make A Splash” for four years and for Citi to look at the work that I’ve been doing and find it credible enough and positive enough that they want to stand behind, that is remarkable. This program is truly helping the next generation of athletes – and it’s so easy to get involved, just check out www.citi.com/everystep.
    Q: You grew up in New Jersey, what does it mean to be able to represent the Garden State again this summer in London?
    A: You know, I am very excited. I like to say that I am from both New York and New Jersey – born in the Bronx and growing up most of my life in New Jersey, so I am happy to represent the tri-state and be a part of a great Olympic team. We all come from different walks of life and I look forward to it.
    Q: Do you feel any more or less pressure competing in swimming as an African American?
    A: I try not to think about it. I try to think of my own goals when it comes to my racing. I have high expectations for myself and me being African American – I am very proud of it. However, that is not what fuels me to swim and want to be faster.
    Q: How much of a role model do you think you are for young people of color looking to compete?
    A: I think that the word role, or the term role model, is a very important thing especially when it comes to wanting to succeed and wanting people to follow you. For me personally, I had a couple of role models, Michael Jordan being one of them, and watching him, he showed what it meant to be a true athlete. What it meant to win gracefully and also lose gracefully. And since I’ve become a role model in swimming, I like to try to hold myself to the same standards and want people to look at me in the same way that I looked at the people that were role models that I looked up to.
    Q: How did you select your charity and are there any goals you would like to meet as far as dollars raised?
    A: Any money that I definitely raise for “Make A Splash” is going directly towards the children to save lives through swimming lessons. Getting them water safety is the biggest thing I want to see, especially in my lifetime. I know that it is a large task, it’s not something that is not going to happen overnight but, but I’d like to see it in my lifetime.
    Q: There is obviously a very high bar that has been set by American swimmers this summer; do you have any personal goals you want to reach?
    A: I didn’t get to swim an individual event in 2008 and I know in 2012 that’s my big goal. I really want to swim 50 free and/or 100 free, and definitely qualify for some relays.
    Q: In addition to training what other projects are you involved in these days?
    A: I’ve been working on my public speaking and I’ve been able to go far and wide and talk to very, very interesting people and tell my story. I’ve been able to have a good time with it, so I’ve been doing a lot of public speaking, along with training, and raising awareness for water safety.
    Q: What post-competition goals do you have? Speaking, broadcasting, other business?
    A: I think I would enjoy doing some kind of commentating especially when it comes to swimming. I am not cancelling that out, but I think that my big goal is definitely to start my own clothing line, starting with jeans, but I don’t just want to kind of jump into that automatically. I just want to learn the business a little bit before I decide to make moves to start my own line.

    Documents show bin Laden targeted Obama, Petraeus

    By Pete Souza, AP
    Documents found in Osama bin Laden's compound detail a number of terrorist plots, including planned assassinations of President Obama and U.S. military commander David Petraeus.
    NBC News reported that the Navy SEALS who carried out last year's mission against bin Laden recovered "five computers, 10 hard drives and more than 100 storage devices -- DVDs, discs and thumb drives -- that included between 10,000 and 15,000 documents and between 15,000 to 25,000 videos, including a large number of duplicate files."
    Counterterrorism officials have briefed NBC on the materials, with some of the conclusions to be included in the Discovery Channel documentary Inside bin Laden's Lair to air tonight. It airs at 10 p.m. ET.
    President Obama announced bin Laden's death one year ago tonight; the raid that killed him took place in the early morning hours of May 2, 2011, Pakistan time.
    Michael Leiter, a counterterrorism official during the Obama and George W. Bush presidencies, told NBC's Today show that bin Laden also dreamed about another major, 9/11-style attack on the United States.
    Leiter noted that, because of diminishing resources, bin Laden's plans -- including an assassination of Obama -- were more of a "wish list.
    "

    Jaywalking mom appeals vehicular homicide in child's death

    The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
    A woman found guilty in the death of her 4-year-old son when she jaywalked  on a busy Cobb County street appealed her conviction Tuesday.
    Raquel Nelson, the Cobb County mom charged with vehicular homicide and crossing outside a crosswalk for the April 2010 death of her four-year-old son is appealing the charges. She leans over and confer with her attorney Steve Sadow, moments beginning oral arguments on the appeal at the Georgia Court of Appeals in downtown Atlanta.
    Vino Wong, vwong@ajc.comRaquel Nelson, the Cobb County mom charged with vehicular homicide and crossing outside a crosswalk for the April 2010 death of her four-year-old son is appealing the charges. She leans over and confer with her attorney Steve Sadow, moments beginning oral arguments on the appeal at the Georgia Court of Appeals in downtown Atlanta.
    Raquel Nelson, the Cobb County mom charged with vehicular homicide and crossing outside a crosswalk for the April 2010 death of her four-year-old son is appealing the charges. She speaks to members of the media with her attorney Steve Sadow, after oral arguments on the appeal at the Georgia Court of Appeals in downtown Atlanta.
    Vino Wong, vwong@ajc.comRaquel Nelson, the Cobb County mom charged with vehicular homicide and crossing outside a crosswalk for the April 2010 death of her four-year-old son is appealing the charges. She speaks to members of the media with her attorney Steve Sadow, after oral arguments on the appeal at the Georgia Court of Appeals in downtown Atlanta.
    Raquel Nelson was granted a retrial last fall after a Cobb County jury found her guilty of vehicular homicide in the 2010 death of her son, A.J. Newman.
    Tuesday morning her attorney, Steve Sadow, told the Court of Appeals of Georgia that the Cobb County Solicitor’s office presented insufficient evidence to prove that Nelson was criminally responsible for her son’s death, or to prove that the death wasn’t accidental.
    “Had she not been [crossing the street] there, there would be no accident,” Sadow told the three appellate judges during his oral argument. “But legally, she was not the cause of the child’s death.”
    He said the jury in the original case was never directed by Cobb State Court Judge Katherine Tankersly to prove Nelson’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
    “The trial judge did not charge on affirmative burden of proof,” Sadow said in the state appeals courtroom.
    Nelson sat quietly on a bench at the rear of the courtroom as her attorney spoke.
    She remains charged with vehicular homicide and with crossing a roadway outside a crosswalk, and faces up to three years in jail.
    Nelson’s son was struck and killed by an admitted drunk driver – Jerry L. Guy – on the night of April 10, 2010, as she returned home on the bus after a day out with A.J. and her two daughters.
    They crossed Austell Road’s northbound lanes to the median rather than walking roughly a half mile in either direction to crosswalks.
    A.J. pulled away from his mother and darted  into the path of Guy’s oncoming van, trying to follow his older sister, who had already made it safely to the other side.
    Nelson and her toddler, whom she was holding while trying to save A.J., were also hit but were not seriously injured.
    Guy served six months in jail, while Nelson faces a jail sentence of up to three years.
    The Cobb Solicitor General’s office did not provide an oral argument. But in a 29-page brief acquired from the Court of Appeals by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Cobb Solicitor General Barry E. Morgan questioned Tankersly’s decision to grant an appeal while defending the evidence used in Nelson’s initial conviction.
    “After the trial, the trial court … without providing its rationale, granted appellant a new trial,” the brief said. “The State contends that a jury of [the] Appellant’s peers had ample evidence to support its verdict, and urges this court to deny [the] Appellant’s appeal.”
    Morgan’s brief identified two points to support denying the appeal:
    1.      “The meaning of the term ‘roadway’ in [Georgia’s statute for crossing a road outside a crosswalk] is unambiguous,” and Nelson “was charged with violating this statute because she crossed Austell Road … when it was unsafe to do so.”
    2.      “To adopt [the] Appellant’s assertion – that a pedestrian has the right of way across all lanes of traffic on a divided highway when she sets foot in the first lane of travel – would create chaos and danger for both drivers and pedestrians. When a pedestrian chooses to cross a divided highway … outside the protection of a crosswalk, she risks her own safety [as] well as the safety of those with her.”
    But Sadow argued that the incident was an accident and shifted the blame to Guy’s impaired driving, saying that motorists can’t expect to never have obstructions in their way.
    “Testimony from [witness Yolanda] Williams was that she had sufficient time to stop,” Sadow said. “The driver of a motor vehicle has no right to assume that the road ahead of him is clear.”
    After his arguments, Sadow said further prosecution of the case was pointless.
    “It serves no valid legal or judicial purpose,” Sadow said.
    The Court of Appeals has two terms, or up to six months, in which to make a decision. Until then, Nelson’s retrial, which had been scheduled to begin last November, is on hold.
    Nelson acknowledged that it was difficult to sit by and watch, powerless, as her fate was decided.
    “It’s hard, but all I can do now is wait,” she said.